Let's Go West with the Nazi Mass Murderers
by Friedrich Paul Berg
In the book for which Elie Wiesel is most famous, namely Night, which is recommended reading in public schools across this country, Wiesel paints an horrendous picture of life in Auschwitz from April 1944 to January 1945 when he was there.Although many hundreds of thousands of Jews were supposedly gassed there during this time, Wiesel makes no mention of gassings or gas chambers anywhere in his book, as Jürgen Graf and Robert Faurisson have pointed out to us. He does however claim to have seen flames from the chimneys and Dr. Mengele wearing a monocle. Both claims are clearly lies.*
When the Russians were about to overrun Auschwitz in January 1945, both Elie and his father "chose" to go west with the retreating 'Nazis' and SS rather than be "liberated" by America's greatest ally. They could have told the whole world about Auschwitz within days but, both Elie and his father as well as countless thousands of other Jews chose instead to trek west with the 'Nazis' on foot at night in the middle of one of the coldest winters and continue working for the defense of the Reich thereafter. In effect, they chose to collaborate.
Some of Wiesel's exact words in Night are:
“The choice was in our hands. For once we could decide our fate for ourselves. We could both stay in the hospital, where I could, thanks to my doctor, get him [the father] entered as a patient or nurse. Or else we could follow the others.
‘Well, what shall we do, father?’
He was silent.
‘Let's be evacuated with the others,’ I said to him.” Elie Wiesel, Night, Bantam Books paperback (1960), page 78. The cover claims the book is “nonfiction.”
Elie's tale in this regard is corroborated by other “survivor” accounts including that of Primo Levi. In Levi's book Survival in Auschwitz, we have his words for January 17th, 1945:
“It was not a question of reasoning: I would probably also have followed the instinct of the flock if I had not felt so weak: fear is supremely contagious, and its immediate reaction is to make one try to run away.”
But he's talking here about running away with the Nazis—and not ‘Nazis’ who were mere rank and file party members but supposedly the worst of the worst. He's talking here about running away with the same ‘Nazis’ and SS who had supposedly carried out the greatest imaginable mass murders of Jews and others in the entire history of the universe. He's talking about running away with the people who supposedly did the actual killings of thousands daily for several years. But, according to his own words he would probably have gone with them nonetheless, except that he was not feeling good that day; he was feeling weak. The "fear" that he overcame was clearly fear of the Russians and not the ‘Nazis;' there is no mention of fear of what the 'Nazis' and SS might do when the evacuees entered the forest or sometime later.
The choices that were made here in January 1945 are enormously important. In the entire history of Jewish suffering at the hands of gentiles what moment in time could possibly be more dramatic than this precious moment when Jews could choose between, on the one hand, liberation by the Soviets with the chance to tell the whole world about the evil 'Nazis' and to help bring about their defeat and the other choice of going with the 'Nazi' mass murderers and to continue working for them and to help preserve their evil regime. In the vast majority of cases, they chose to go with the 'Nazis'.
photo from: David O'Connell
The momentous choice brings Shakespeare's Hamlet to mind:
“To remain, or not to remain; that is the question: to remain and be liberated by Soviet troops and risk their slings and rifles in order to tell the whole world about the outrageous ‘Nazis’--or, take arms and feet against a sea of cold and darkness in order to collaborate with the very same outrageous ‘Nazis.’ Oh, what heartache--ay, there's the rub! Thus conscience does make cowards of us all.”
So what was the final score—here a drum roll seems fitting in the background as Vanna White comes onto the stage with the sealed envelope and the answer to the great riddle. The envelope is torn open and the choice is—drum roll again—according to Levi himself 800 choose to remain in Auschwitz, but 20,000 choose to go and collaborate with the 'Nazi' mass murderers. Wow! Such a surprise—already!
We see the same deliberate pro-Nazi collaboration in the “survivors” from Schindler's List. As the Russians were about to overrun Plaszow just thirty miles down the road to the east from Auschwitz in November 1944, Schindler and more than a thousand Jews chose to go west with the retreating Nazis rather than hang back and be “liberated” by the Soviets. Some even spent the next several weeks at Auschwitz—and none were gassed, not even in the movie. The hoax has certainly had its day. If there had been any kind of extermination of Jews at all Auschwitz, all of the Jews in Cracow and Plaszow would have known about it as well. All of the Jews who went west, in effect, also denied the Holocaust albeit only with their hands and feet. The Jews themselves were the first true Holocaust deniers, and it is about time they get all the credit they truly deserve.
The rather simple analysis of “Holocaust survivor” tales I have given here is an easy to understand refutation of the hoax in general. I urge all readers to reexamine “survivor accounts” for themselves but critically and systematically. The internet with search engines like Google allows anyone to analyze literally thousands of survivor accounts in seconds for major flaws of the type I have discussed. Just search for keywords like “evacuation” or combinations of words like “holocaust survivor Auschwitz.”
Page 77 of Night also includes some discussion of the imminent “evacuation” and the possible consequences. Although the “faceless one” insisted that Hitler was going to “annihilate” the Jews and kill all the invalids, Elie rejected that advice. At the top of page 78, Elie tells us that he was “not thinking of death” but did not want to be separated from his father. If he wasn't even thinking death, he could not have been worried about being killed by the Nazis in the camp or during the “evacuation” either.
Another noteworthy part of Night is page 31 where Elie describes his arrival in Auschwitz at night and how he and his father were marched, step by step, to a flaming pit (without chains, or handcuffs, or any physical restraint). But, one moment before they were to be consumed in the flaming pit (no gas chambers or crematory ovens required), Elie and his father “were ordered to turn to the left and made to go into a barracks.”
One last piece of literature for this discussion is the highly acclaimed book Sophie's Choice by William Styron. What does Styron have to say about Sophie or any other Auschwitz survivor going west in January 1945? What insights might Styron reveal? The book is a novel, but it is an historical novel by a great writer and intellect—or so we are told— where we might find an explanation for Elie's kind of choice. But, there is really nothing there. The important choice Sophie made in the book was between her two children; which one should be killed in the gas chamber and which one should live? Certainly, that would have been a heart-wrenching choice and worthy of a great novel—but as to the later choice to go west with the 'Nazi’ mass murderers, even the murderers of one of those same precious children, there was nothing except the following:
“The Russians were coming and the SS wanted the children destroyed. Most of them were Polish; the Jewish children were already dead. They thought of burning them alive in a pit, or shooting them, but they decided to do something that wouldn't show too many marks and evidence. So in the freezing cold they marched the children down to the river and made them take off their clothes and soak them in the water as if they were washing them, and then made them put on these wet clothes again. Then they marched them back to the area in front of the barracks where they had been living and had a roll call. Standing in their wet clothes. The roll call lasted for many, many hours while the children stood wet and freezing and night came. All of the children died of being exposed that day. They died of exposure and pneumonia, very fast.”
That would have been all the more reason to stay in Auschwitz and eagerly wait the Soviets rather than go west with the Nazi and SS mass murderers. I dare say there is not even the slightest corroboration for Styron's tale of the freezing children—but his obscene tale is widely disseminated without any serious criticism at all\. Such is the pathetic state of literature in America today. Although Styron does not tell us, Sophie apparently chose to trek west with the Nazi murderers as well.
The fact is that hundreds of thousands of Jews chose to collaborate and help defend the Reich and Europe because they knew perfectly well, from their own experience over several years, that they would be treated well and given food, shelter, medical attention, protection and more (they were probably paid for their work as well) from the SS. Why else would they have possibly chosen to go west with the Nazis? Fear of communism or the Soviets? Many Jews were communists themselves. I dare say, every Jew knew the Soviet Union was their friend where Jews were protected and had risen to positions of influence and power out of all proportion to their numbers. And yet, they generally preferred to go west with the supposed Nazi mass murderers. Obviously, the Jews were either in deep denial, or the Holocaust story is a monstrous hoax just as revisionists claim.
The horrors in many camps at the end of the war were a direct and inevitable result of Allied bombing and strafing. The real mass murderers were the Americans and the British. Can anyone seriously believe that the horrors of the concentration camps at the end of the war were any worse that the deliberate horrors of ASllied bombing? Do the victims in the camps look any worse than the victims of Allied terror bombing? The horrors of Bergen-Belsen and Dachau at the end of the war bore no relation to conditions in Auschwitz or other camps months earlier when the Germans were still able to maintain sanitary discipline.
The SS were indeed the good guys and all of us owe them our eternal gratitude for keeping at least part of Europe free from communism—and that is what gave the rest of the world a chance as well. The Jews must have understood that—but, of course, when the war was over they changed their tune completely: They were, suddenly, the greatest victims in the entire history of the world and, of course, deserved special consideration far above and beyond everyone else who suffered in the war. The truth is that six months earlier they were lining up by their own choice to stay with and work for the Nazis and the Nazi war effort.
No doubt, Anne Frank and her father were among the Jews who preferred the company of alleged Nazi murderers rather than that of the Soviets. That is why she died in Bergen-Belsen, far to the west, rather than in Auschwitz. The good guys were the Nazis.
*An excellent essay about Elie Wiesel is by David O’Connell: http://www.culturewars.com/2004/Weisel.htm
return to Index Page
NAZI Gassings Never Happened! Niemand wurde